Before a source review
Compare two readings, field by field.
Put your source reading beside the statement in the working paper. See what needs another look.
You supply both readings. This tool does not open an image, search records or interpret the instrument. Use short nonconfidential fields, not private client files.
Your supplied readings
One field per line. A blank source or working field remains missing; its position is preserved. Up to one hundred rows. Text is compared exactly, including spaces, punctuation and formatting.
Example names, references and dates are invented. Loading the example replaces this comparison input only; it does not send a message.
What the result means
- Same supplied text
- The strings agree. Both could still contain the same error; inspect the source before relying on them.
- Text differs
- Read the relevant source image again. A formatting difference is not automatically a substantive disagreement.
- A reading is missing
- Locate or read that field. A missing reading does not establish that a record or right does not exist.
Keep the evidence-state checklist with the comparison. A person at Landman Services can discuss a separately scoped review; the result itself approves no title or deliverable.